Archive for the ‘Sarah’ Tag

Above: Icon of the Magnificat
Image in the Public Domain
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING LUKE-ACTS, PART III
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Luke 1:5-46
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Consensus among scholars of the New Testament holds that the first two chapters of the Gospel of Luke are the that work in miniature. Luke 1 and 2 introduce themes the rest of that Gospel develops.
Luke 1:5 grounds the audience in time and place. We read the name of the Roman client king: Herod (the Great).
Herod the Great (r. 37-48 B.C.E.) married into the Hasmonean Dynasty and founded his own. The Herodian Dynasty held power (under the Roman aegis) until 70 C.E. Herod the Great, the Governor of Galilee (47-37 B.C.E.), became the King of the Jews in 37 B.C.E. He had authority in Judea and Galilee.
Consider calendars, O reader. Judaism had its calendar. The Romans had their calendar, which started with the founding of Rome–on the B.C.E./B.C.-C.E./A/D. scale, 753 B.C.E./B.C. The B.C.E./B.C.-C.E./A.D. scale dates to what we call the 500s C.E./A.D., when St. Dionysius Exiguus introduced it. I notice that he miscalculated, for St. Dionysius attempted to place the birth of Jesus one week before the beginning of the year 1 Anno Domini (In the Year of Our Lord). Yet Herod the Great died in 4 B.C.E. Consider the account of the Massacre of the Innocents (Matthew 2:16-18). I contend that a tyrant who had been dead for three years could not have ordered that slaughter. I conclude, therefore, that St. Dionysius miscalculated.
I use “Before the Common Era” (B.C.E.) because I refuse to refer to the birth of Jesus as having occurred “Before Christ.”
Much happens, on the surface and beneath it, in these verses. Some of these are:
- We read the identification of St. John the Baptist with Elijah (verse 17), indicating eschatological expectations regarding Jesus.
- St. Elizabeth is reminiscent of Hannah in 1 Samuel 1.
- The Song of Hannah (1 Samuel 2) is the model for the Magnificat.
- We read that St. John the Baptist will go before “him” (verse 17), indicating YHWH, not Jesus.
- We are also supposed to think of Abram/Abraham and Sarai/Sarah (Genesis 15 and 17).
- Being disturbed or afraid when encountering an angel is a Biblical motif.
- The Holy Spirit is a major theme in Luke-Acts. It makes its Lucan debut in 1:35.
- In Hebrew angelology, there are seven archangels. 1 Enoch 19:1-20:8 names them: Gabriel, Suru’el, Raphael (who features in the Book of Tobit), Raguel, Michael, Uriel (who features in 2 Esdras/4 Ezra), and Sarafa’el. An alternative text of 1 Enoch mentions another name, Remiel. Seven, being the number of perfection, may be symbolic. Or Remiel may be an alternative name for one of the archangels.
- The Lucan theme of reversal of fortune is prominent in the Magnificat.
- I recommend consulting Raymond E. Brown, The Birth of the Messiah--Updated Edition (1993), 358-360, for a detailed, line-by-line breakdown of the Magnificat, with citations from the Hebrew Bible, 2 Esdras/4 Ezra, Sirach/Ecclesiasticus, and the Psalms of Solomon.
- Childlessness was, in the culture, always the woman’s fault, regardless of biology.
- St. John the Baptist was certainly just kicking (1:41). Unborn children kick.
- Verses 5-56 are about what God did and how people responded.
Underneath it all is a celebration of God. God has taken the initiative–God the Lord, the saviour, the Powerful One, the Holy One, the Merciful One, the Faithful One. God is the ultimate reason to celebrate.
–N. T. Wright, Advent for Everyone: Luke–A Daily Devotional (2018), 89
I agree.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
DECEMBER 21, 2021 COMMON ERA
THE TWENTY-FOURTH DAY OF ADVENT
THE FEAST OF SAINT THOMAS THE APOSTLE, MARTYR
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Holofernes
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING JUDITH
PART VI
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Judith 10:1-12:20
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Holofernes was like his master, King Nebuchadnezzar II. He was vain, boastful, and quick to accept flattery. The general also consumed lies as easily and in great quantities as easily as he drank too much wine.
Judith played the role of the seductress well. She understood male nature, which she exploited. In doing so, Judith placed herself in much danger. She was even sleeping in the tent of Holofernes. Her undercover (pardon the pun) mission was always perilous.
A few aspects of these three chapters are especially worthy of explanation and elaboration.
- Judith lied when she said her people were so desperate they were about to violate the food laws in the Law of Moses. She referenced Leviticus 17:10-16 and Numbers 18:8-32. Yet, at the time of the composition of the Book of Judith, any violation of the Law of Moses for the purpose of preserving human life was acceptable, according to one school of Jewish thought (1 Maccabees 2:29-41).
- Ironically, Holofernes told the truth, at least partially. He said that Judith was renowned throughout the world (11:20-23). The Book of Judith has long provided inspiration for artists.
- Judith was in extreme sexual danger (12:5). So was Sarah in Genesis 12:10-20 and 20:17.
- Judith established her routine of leaving the Assyrian army camp unchallenged each night (12:6-9). This strategy paid off in 13:11.
- Judith had to work quickly. She had only five days to deliver her people (7:29-32; 8:32-35).
- Judith obeyed kosher food laws, even in the Assyrian army camp. (One may think of Daniel and his friends in Daniel 1, too.)
- Judith’s unnamed female maid/servant was loyal and essential. Judith’s servant was intelligent, unlike the gullible Bagoas, servant of Holofernes.
- In 11:19-23, Judith used language laced with allusions to the prophets and the Book of Psalms. Verses 19 and 20, for example, echoed Isaiah 40:3-4; 35:8-10; 42:16; 51:11; 56:10-11;; as well as 2 Samuel 7:13; Psalm 89:4; Ezekiel 34:8; Zechariah 10:2 and 13:7.
- Ironically, the wisdom at which Holofernes marveled was deception.
- The words of Holofernes, “…your God will be my God…” (11:22), an echo of Ruth 1:16, are vague. Perhaps the character had no idea what he was saying.
- Holofernes lusted after Judith (11:16).
- The texts depict Judith as a great beauty. They also describe Assyrian soldiers as drooling over her. Therein resided part of Judith’s power, which she used to the full extent necessary.
The Book of Judith contains elements of satire and comedy. The text is rich with irony in many places. For example, even a boastful fool accidentally tells the truth sometimes. The intoxicated Holofernes also imagines himself to be in control of the situation. He has no idea how wrong he is.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
DECEMBER 11, 2020 COMMON ERA
THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF ADVENT
THE FEAST OF LUKE OF PRAGUE AND JOHN AUGUSTA, MORAVIAN BISHOPS AND HYMN WRITERS
THE FEAST OF SAINT KAZIMIERZ TOMASZ SYKULSKI, ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIEST AND MARTYR, 1942
THE FEAST OF LARS OLSEN SKREFSRUD, HANS PETER BOERRESEN, AND PAUL OLAF BODDING, LUTHERAN MISSIONARIES IN INDIA
THE FEAST OF MARYRS OF EL MOZOTE, EL SALVADOR, DECEMBER 11-12, 1981
THE FEAST OF SAINT SEVERIN OTT, ROMAN CATHOLIC MONK
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Arphaxad
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING JUDITH
PART I
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Judith 1:1-16
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Book of Judith is a novella, like the Books of Tobit and Esther. This story exists in two parts. Chapters 1-7 establish the crisis facing the Jews of Bethulia. Chapters 8-16 contain the story of the titular character. The Book of Judith, composed between 135 and 100 B.C.E., during or shortly after the reign (134-104 B.C.E.) of John Hyrcanus I (named in 1 Maccabees 13:53, 16:1-23), includes details and characters from five centuries, mixed and matched in odd combinations. The Book of Judith also exists in four Greek recensions, four ancient translations, and a Hebrew translation from the Vulgate version.
The Book of Judith, although never in the Jewish canon of scripture, has canonical status in the Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches. Certain early Christian writings attest to the high esteem in which some saints held that text. One can, for example, read St. Jerome (347-419), the great, frequently moody translator of the Vulgate, describing Judith as (1) a model widow, and (2) a type of the Church. One can also read of St. Jerome describing St. Mary of Nazareth, the Mother and Bearer of God, as a new Judith. One can also read St. Clement (I) of Rome, Bishop of Rome from 88/91 to 97/101, writing in his (First) Epistle to the Corinthians, cite Esther and Judith as examples of heroic love of their people.
“Judith,” literally “Jewish woman,” echoes other Jewish women. These include Jael (Judges 4), Deborah (Judges 4-5), and Sarah (Genesis 11, 12, 16-18, 20-22).
Now, for Judith 1:1-16….
Do not bother trying to keep track of historical dates, O reader; they are all over the chronology. Likewise, the measurements of the wall of Ectabana are hyperbolic. Who has ever seen a wall 105 feet high and 75 feet thick, with tower gates 150 feet high and 60 feet wide?
On the surface, this is a story about the warfare between King Arphaxad of the Medes and King Nebuchadnezzar II (allegedly of the Neo-Assyrian Empire, but really of the Chaldean/Neo-Babylonian Empire). Chapter 1 ends with Jews in Samaria and Judah dreading the wrath of Nebuchadnezzar II for not supporting his campaign against Arphaxad.
A careful reader may know that King Nebuchadnezzar II governed from Babylon, not Nineveh.
Chapter 1 sets up the rest of the Book of Judith. One theme is already evident. That theme is whether one should be loyal to a tyrant. The answer is “no.”
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
DECEMBER 6, 2020 COMMON ERA
THE SECOND SUNDAY OF ADVENT
THE EIGHTH DAY OF ADVENT
THE FEAST OF SAINT NICHOLAS OF MYRA, BISHOP
THE FEAST OF SAINT ABRAHAM OF KRATIA, ROMAN CATHOLIC MONK, ABBOT, BISHOP, AND HERMIT
THE FEAST OF ALICE FREEMAN PALMER, U.S. EDUCATOR AND HYMN WRITER
THE FEAST OF HENRY USTICK ONDERDONK, EPISCOPAL BISHOP, LITURGIST, AND HYMN WRITER
THE FEAST OF PHILIP AND DANIEL BERRIGAN, ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIESTS AND SOCIAL ACTIVISTS
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: How Ahikar Outwitted the King of Egypt, by Henry Justice Ford
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING TOBIT
PART XI
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tobit 14:1b-15
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The novella of Tobit ends as it beings–with historically inaccurate details. Nevertheless, the theology of the book is what really matters.
Superficially, the end of the Book of Tobit resembles the conclusion of the Book of Job. Within that structure, we read “prophecies” projected backward into an anachronistic time. We also read reiteration of major themes of the Book of Tobit. Just in case one forgets about almsgiving, Tobit 14:9 tells one again. And we, in that context, read an allusion to The Story of Ahikar in 14:10-11a.
I have refrained from summarizing The Story of Ahikar so far. This is an appropriate post in which to provide that summary.
Ahikar/Ahiqar was a childless royal official in the court of Kings Sennacherib and Esarhaddon. Ahikar adopted his nephew, Nadin/Nadab, whom he groomed to succeed him in royal service. The ungrateful Nadin/Nadab falsely accused his uncle of treason. Ahikar, condemned to die, survived when the executioner, whom he had saved earlier, rescued him. Ahikar lived in a cave under his (Ahikar’s) house until he accepted a challenge to compete in a contest of wisdom in Egypt. Ahikar received his honor back. Nadir/Nadab died in prison.
The Story of Ahikar also contained proverbs, such as
For he who digs a pit for his brother shall fall into it;
and he who sets up traps shall be caught in them.
–7:58b
Tobit and Anna died. Then Tobias, Sarah, and their children moved in with Raguel and Edna, paying off the Chekovian gun in 10:12.
The Book of Tobit concludes with the wicked perishing and the righteous flourishing. Given that I have already covered the Book of Retribution in this series, I will not repeat myself much in this post. I do wish that more of the wicked would repent, that the unrepentant wicked would fall on their faces and meet with unending frustration, and that more of the righteous would flourish. Alas, that is not the world in which I live.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
DECEMBER 5, 2020 COMMON ERA
THE SEVENTH DAY OF ADVENT
THE FEAST OF SAINT CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA, FATHER OF CHRISTIAN SCHOLARSHIP
THE FEAST OF SAINT CYRAN, ROMAN CATHOLIC ABBOT
THE FEAST OF NELSON MANDELA, PRESIDENT OF SOUTH AFRICA, AND RENEWER OF SOCIETY
THE FEAST OF SAINT NICETIUS OF TRIER, ROMAN CATHOLIC MONK, ABBOT, AND BISHOP; AND SAINT AREDIUS OF LIMOGES, ROMAN CATHOLIC MONK
THE FEAST OF PETER MORTIMER, ANGLO-GERMAN MORAVIAN EDUCATOR, MUSICIAN, AND SCHOLAR; AND GOTTFRIED THEODOR ERXLEBEN, GERMAN MORAVIAN MINISTER AND MUSICOLOGIST
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: The Healing of Tobit, by Bernardo Strozzi
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING TOBIT
PART IX
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tobit 11:7-12:22
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tobit had the money he needed. He also had a new daughter-in-law (Sarah) and the restoration of his eyesight. He did not expect these blessings. Tobit, being pious, praised God at the top of his voice. He, prepared to die, had new, better life. Even Ahikar (1:21-22; 2:10) joined the celebration (11:18).
Tobias, assuming that his guide was a mere mortal, paid “Azarias” handsomely and attributed the success of the journey to him. “Azarias,” really the archangel Raphael, gave all the credit to God then revealed his identity and departed. I guess the dog did, too. If the canine was also an angel in disguise, why not?
Anyway, the last mention of the dog occurs in 11:4. The dog may indeed be a remnant from folklore. The author of the Book of Tobit seems to have had little interest in the canine.
According to Judeo-Christian angelology, there are seven archangels (Tobit 12:15; 1 Enoch 20:1-8). We have the names of all of them:
- Raphael (Tobit 3:16-17/18, depending on versification; Tobit 5-4-8:3); Tobit 9:1-6; Tobit 11:1-12:22; 1 Enoch 20:3);
- Gabriel (Daniel 8:16; Daniel 9:21; 1 Enoch 20:7; Luke 1:19, 26);
- Michael (Daniel 10:13, 21; Daniel 12:1; 1 Enoch 20:5; Jude 9; Revelation 12:7);
- Uriel (2 Esdras 4:1; 2 Esdras 5:20; 2 Esdras 10:28);
- Raguel (1 Enoch 20:4);
- Saraqael (1 Enoch 20:6); and
- Suruel (1 Enoch 20:2).
A Greek fragment of 1 Enoch adds another name: Remiel, perhaps an alternative name for Uriel, and definitely not an alternative name for any of the other six archangels.
In the story, Raphael insisted that he was merely performing God’s bidding, so God deserved all the praise and glory. The angel, who could not exist apart from God, was an agent of God.
May we also be agents of God, by grace. And may we glorify God, not ourselves.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
DECEMBER 3, 2020 COMMON ERA
THE FIFTH DAY OF ADVENT
THE FEAST OF SAINT MARUTHAS, ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF MAYPHERKAT AND MISSIONARY TO PERSIA
THE FEAST OF AMILIE JULIANE, COUNTESS OF SCHWARZBURG-RUDOLSTADT, GERMAN LUTHERAN HYMN WRITER
THE FEAST OF ARCHIBALD CAMPBELL TAIT, ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY
THE FEAST OF SAINT FRANCIS XAVIER, ROMAN CATHOLIC MISSIONARY TO THE FAR EAST
THE FEAST OF SOPHIE KOULOMZIN, RUSSIAN-AMERICAN CHRISTIAN EDUCATOR
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This is post #2400 of BLOGA THEOLOGICA.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Raguel’s Blessing of His Daughter Sarah Before Leaving Ecbatana with Tobias, by Andrea Vaccaro
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING TOBIT
PART VIII
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tobit 10:1-11:6
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Raguel and Edna (8:8-11) were not the only anxious parents in the story. Let us not forget Anna (5:18-22; 6:1). Tobit 10:1-7 tells us of the anxieties of Tobit and Anna. One may recall that Tobit was comforting Anna in Chapter 5. We read of him trying to console her and himself in Chapter 10.
We in the reading audience know what Tobit and Anna did not. We know that an elaborate two-week-long wedding celebration delayed the return of Tobias. Furthermore, we read of Tobias and Sarah, with Raphael/Azariah/Azarias and the dog (a second angel in disguise) arriving in Nineveh.
Sometimes events do not play out as we expect. Sometimes they play out better than we expect. God’s blessings frequently exceed our expectations.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
DECEMBER 2, 2020 COMMON ERA
THE FOURTH DAY OF ADVENT
THE FEAST OF MAURA CLARKE AND HER COMPANIONS, U.S. ROMAN CATHOLIC MARTYRS IN EL SALVADOR, DECEMBER 2, 1980
THE FEAST OF CHANNING MOORE WILLIAMS, EPISCOPAL MISSIONARY BISHOP IN CHINA AND JAPAN
THE FEAST OF GERALD THOMAS NOEL, ANGLICAN PRIEST AND HYMN WRITER; HIS BROTHER, BAPTIST WRIOTHESLEY NOEL, ANGLICAN PRIEST, ENGLISH BAPTIST EVANGELIST, AND HYMN WRITER; AND HIS NIECE, CAROLINE MARIA NOEL, ANGLICAN HYMN WRITER
THE FEAST OF SAINT HORMISDAS, BISHOP OF ROME; AND HIS SON, SAINT SILVERIUS, BISHOP OF ROME, AND MARTYR, 537
THE FEAST OF SAINT RAFAL CHYLINSKI, POLISH ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIEST
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: The Marriage of Tobias, by Giovanni Antonio Guardi
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING TOBIT
PART VII
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tobit 7:1-9:6
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The betrothal of Tobias and Sarah (Tobit 7:3-5) follows models from Genesis. The models are the betrothals of Isaac and Rebekah (Genesis 24) and of Jacob to Rachel (he thought) in Genesis 29:4-6. Other examples of links to Genesis exist in Tobit. Cataloging them, however, does not interest me. Besides, I can read that catalog in The New Interpreter’s Bible, Volume III (1999).
Raguel hoping for the best yet having an eighth grave dug overnight was an ironic scene. Given the fates of the first seven husbands, this precaution was necessary.
Upper Egypt, according to folk belief, was the home of demons, therefore the proper place for Asmodeus to go.
Tobit 7-9 tells us a story of two families uniting and of the vanquishing of an evil entity. There is more good news to come.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
DECEMBER 1, 2020 COMMON ERA
THE THIRD DAY OF ADVENT
THE FEAST OF SAINT CHARLES DE FOUCAULD, ROMAN CATHOLIC HERMIT AND MARTYR
THE FEAST OF ALBERT BARNES, U.S. PRESBYTERIAN MINISTER, ABOLITIONIONST, AND ALLEGED HERETIC
THE FEAST OF SAINT BRIOC, ROMAN CATHOLIC ABBOT; AND SAINT TUDWAL, ROMAN CATHOLIC ABBOT AND BISHOP
THE FEAST OF DOUGLASS LETELL RIGHTS, U.S. MORAVIAN MINISTER, SCHOLAR, AND HYMN WRITER
THE FEAST OF EDWARD TIMOTHY MICKEY, JR., U.S. MORAVIAN BISHOP AND LITURGIST
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Tobias and the Angel, by Wenceslas Hollar
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING TOBIT
PART VI
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tobit 5:1-6:17/18 (depending on versification)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Book of Tobit is a novella with faulty history and geography. Regarding geography, making the journey from Nineveh to Ectabana (about 450 miles) in a mere two days thousands of years ago would have been miraculous. I realize that Azariah/Azarias means “God has helped,” but the geography in the story remains erroneous.
The dog is an odd detail, starting in Tobit 6:2 and again in 11:4.
- Dogs were unclean animals and not pets. Biblical texts mentioned them in negative terms. (Exodus 11:7; Judith 11:9; Luke 16:21; Proverbs 26:17; 2 Peter 2:22; Exodus 22:31; I Kings 14:11; 1 Kings 16:4, 21; 1 Kings 19:23-24; 1 Kings 22:38; 2 Kings 9:10, 36; Psalm 68:23-24; Jeremiah 15:3).
- “Dog” was a term of contempt for a human being. (1 Samuel 17:43; 2 Kings 8:13; Matthew 15:26; Mark 7:27)
- Sometimes “dog” referred to the wicked. (Isaiah 56:10-11; Philippians 3:2; Revelation 22:15)
- Sometimes “dog” also referred to a male temple prostitute. (Deuteronomy 23:18-19)
- Mentioning a dog in positive terms in Tobit 6:2 and 11:4 was, therefore, odd. Perhaps it was a remnant of an older folk tale. In the context of the Book of Tobit, the dog was a second angel in disguise.
The reference to the fish (Tobit 6:3) that tried to swallow Tobias’s “foot” is one aspect of the story one can explain easily. We are in the realm of euphemism. As elsewhere “feet” are really genitals. (Exodus 4:25; Ruth 3:7; Isaiah 6:2)
The fish-related cure for blindness and method of repelling demons are fascinating aspects of this folklore. What a fish!
In these two chapters we read of God indirectly setting the healing of Tobit and Sarah into motion. We also read of Raphael preparing Tobias to marry Sarah. God has a hidden hand in the Book of Tobit. God works subtly in this story. Many of us can cite examples of God’s subtle, hidden hand in our lives and in the lives of others.
The Book of Tobit is partially about wellness. In this reading, Tobit, Anna, and Sarah are not well. Tobit is blind, Anna is overwhelmed, and Sarah is at the end of her rope. By the end of the book, all of them are well.
But what is true wellness? The best answer I can find comes from Irene Nowell, O.S.B., writing in The New Interpreter’s Bible, Volume III (1999):
True wellness is a consequence of humility, the recognition that life and health are gifts from God.
True wellness is heavily spiritual.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
NOVEMBER 30, 2020 COMMON ERA
THE SECOND DAY OF ADVENT
THE FEAST OF SAINT ANDREW THE APOSTLE, MARTYR
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Asmodeus, by Louis Le Breton
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING TOBIT
PART IV
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tobit 3:7-16
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tobit had endured ridicule and was suffering from blindness (2:8f). Then he had falsely accused his wife Anna of having stolen a kid (2:12f) and prayed for death (3:1-6). Themes repeated in the case of Sarah, falsely accused of having killed seven husbands while remaining a virgin (3:7f) and who also prayed for death (3:11-15). The demon Asmodeus had killed the seven husbands on those wedding nights.
God assigned the archangel Raphael (“God has healed”) to solve the problems of Sarah and Tobit.
Various elements are at work in these verses.
- Seven is the number of completeness and fullness. By the standards of her culture, Sarah would not marry again.
- The disgrace of suicide is a theme. This theme occurs also in 1 Samuel 31:4-5; 2 Samuel 17:23; 1 Kings 16:18; and 2 Maccabees 14:41-46. The prohibition against committing suicide is implicit in Genesis 9:4-6 and Exodus 20:13.
- Asmodeus is a reference to Aeshma Daeva, the Persian “demon of wrath.” The Book of Tobit bears a resemblance to the Persian folktale “The Monster in the Bridal Chamber.” In this folk tale, a serpent emerges from the mouth of the bride-princess on her wedding night and kills her husband. Finally, after a series of husbands has perished, a stranger marries her and kills the serpent.
- God answers prayers.
Suicide is an emotionally difficult subject. I have never accepted that people who commit suicide automatically go to Hell. If suicide is a sin, it is not the unpardonable sin. And those who, not in their right minds, commit suicide, are not responsible, at least not in the way one in one’s right mind is.
This matter is real, not theoretical, for me. I am in my right mind. I used to be in love with a woman who struggled with mental illnesses. The mental illnesses overpowered her. She was not in her right mind at the end. Now I am, in my words, “not quite a widower.” I pray that my beloved has found her peace. I have yet to find mine.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
NOVEMBER 28, 2020 COMMON ERA
THE FEAST OF SAINT STEPHEN THE YOUNGER, DEFENDER OF ICONS
THE FEAST OF ALBERT GEORGE BUTZER, SR., U.S. PRESBYTERIAN MINISTER AND EDUCATOR
THE FEAST OF KAMEHAMEHA IV AND EMMAR ROOKE, KING AND QUEEN OF HAWAI’I
THE FEAST OF JOSEPH AND MICHAEL HOFER, U.S. HUTTERITE CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS AND MARTYRS, 1918
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Hannah Before Eli
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING 1-2 SAMUEL, 1 KINGS, 2 KINGS 1-21, 1 CHRONICLES, AND 2 CHRONICLES 1-33
PART II
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 Samuel 1:1-2:11
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I will give thanks to you, O LORD, with my whole heart;
I will tell of all your marvelous works.
I will be glad and rejoice in you;
I will sing to your Name, O Most High.
–Psalm 9:1-2, The Book of Common Prayer (1979)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
In Hannah’s culture, infertility was a curse and a source of humiliation for women. Several Biblical authors wrote of formerly barren women, including Sarah, Rebekah, Rachel, and the mother of Samson, as well as Hannah. (See Genesis 21:1-8; Genesis 25:19-26;l Genesis 30:1-2, 22-24); and Judges 13:2-3, also.) In each case, the offspring entered the world with a divine purpose. Samuel, in particular, provided moral guidance to his people. Many people ignored him, but he continued to offer the moral advice.
Elkanah, despite being a kind man and a loving husband, seems to have been oblivious to the bad blood between Hannah and Peninnah. He favored Hannah (“charming” or “attractive”) and had children with Peninnah (“fertile” or “prolific”). The double portion of the sacrifice Elkanah gave to Hannah contrasted with the portions he gave to Peninnah, his sons, and his daughters with her.
Hannah was pious. Her manner of prayer at Shiloh was unusual; moving one’s lips yet not speaking was a rare method of praying in that culture at the time. The priest Eli mistook her desperation and her way of praying for intoxication.
Hannah asked. God granted. Hannah kept her word.
Grace is the foundation of this story. Grace is free yet not cheap; it carries obligations. Grace also transforms despair into thanksgiving and creates a better future out of a bleak present.
The Song of Hannah (2:1-10) is a later text. It mentions a king in verse. That reference to a monarch cannot be contemporary with Hannah, whose lifetime preceded the Israelite monarchy. The themes fit her circumstances, though. And, if the text reminds you, O reader, of another song, you may be thinking of the Magnificat (Luke 1:46-55), modeled on the Song of Hannah.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
AUGUST 14, 2020 COMMON ERA
THE FEAST OF WILLIAM CROFT, ANGLICAN ORGANIST AND COMPOSER
THE FEAST OF JOHN BAJUS, U.S. LUTHERAN MINISTER AND HYMN TRANSLATOR
THE FEAST OF JOHN HENRY HOPKINS, JR., EPISCOPAL PRIEST AND HYMNODIST; AND HIS NEPHEW, JOHN HENRY HOPKINS, III, EPISCOPAL PRIEST AND MUSICIAN
THE FEAST OF SAINT MAXIMILIAN KOLBE, ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIEST AND MARTYR, 1941; AND JONATHAN MYRICK DANIELS, EPISCOPAL SEMINARIAN AND MARTYR, 1965
THE FEAST OF SARAH FLOWER ADAMS, ENGLISH UNITARIAN HYMN WRITER; AND HER SISTER, ELIZA FLOWER, ENGLISH UNITARIAN COMPOSER
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You must be logged in to post a comment.