Archive for the ‘Herod the Great’ Tag

Above: Herod Agrippa I
Image in the Public Domain
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING LUKE-ACTS, PART LXVI
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Acts 12:1-25
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Herod Agrippa I was a Roman client king from 37 to 44 C.E. We have another, more precise, dated detail–the martyrdom of St. James Bar-Zebedee (the brother of Saint John the Evangelist and a first cousin of Jesus–circa 44 C.E,
Herod Agrippa (10 B.C.E.-44 C.E.) was a grandson of Herod the Great, the brother of Herodias, the uncle of Salome, and a brother-in-law of Herod Antipas. Herod Agrippa I, who lived extravagantly and in debt, found refuge courtesy of Herod Antipas, who appointed him the inspector of markets in Antipas’s new capital, Tiberias, circa 27 C.E. Herod Agrippa I, a friend of Gaius Caligula, made a pro-Caligula remark in the presence of Emperor Tiberius in Rome six months prior to the death of Tiberius (d. 37 C.E.) Therefore, Herod Agrippa I spent the last six months of Tiberius’s reign as a prisoner. Caligula (reigned 37-41 C.E.) released Herod Agrippa I and appointed him a king in 37 C.E. After Caligula died, Emperor Claudis (I) expanded Herod Agrippa I’s territory to include Judea and Samaria. Herod Agrippa I, a supporter of Pharisaic Judaism, persecuted Christianity (Acts 2 and 12). His death in Caesarea (Acts 12:22-23) was sudden. The Biblical text wrote of his death so as to portray him as evil and unrepentant, in the infamous footsteps of Antiochus IV Epiphanes and Judas Iscariot.
Regardless of martyrdoms and persecution, the Christian movement remained unhindered.
Meanwhile, Sts. (Joseph) Barnabas and Paul the Apostle returned to Antioch from Jerusalem. This relief mission complete, they brought St. (John) Mark to Antioch.
I feel sorry for the guards Herod Agrippa I ordered executed. They did their job guarding St. Simon Peter. On the other hand, I am glad St. Simon Peter escaped.
The rest of the story: A series of Roman procurators succeeded Herod Agrippa I until 66 C.E.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
APRIL 22, 2022 COMMON ERA
FRIDAY IN EASTER WEEK
THE FEAST OF GENE BRITTON, EPISCOPAL PRIEST
THE FEAST OF DONALD S. ARMENTROUT, U.S. LUTHERAN MINISTER AND SCHOLAR
THE FEAST OF HADEWIJCH OF BRABERT, ROMAN CATHOLIC MYSTIC
THE FEAST OF KATHE KOLLWITZ, GERMAN LUTHERAN ARTIST AND PACIFIST
THE FEAST OF SAINT VITALIS OF GAZA, MONK, HERMIT, AND MARTYR, CIRCA 625
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: The Destruction of Jerusalem, by David Roberts
Image in the Public Domain
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING LUKE-ACTS, PART XLIX
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Luke 20:45-21:4
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Second Temple, at the time of Jesus, was a greatly-expanded version of the structure dedicated after then Babylonian Exile. King Herod the Great, hardly a paragon of piety and virtue, had financed the expansion of the Temple. In so doing, he had assuaged many religious leaders. This was the Temple where corrupt scribes devoured the property of widows. This was the Temple where many devout people went on pilgrimages. This was the Temple where Jesus taught when he was twelve years old. This was the Temple where a poor widow gave all she had on which to live. This was the Temple Roman soldiers destroyed in 70 C.E.
St. Luke the Evangelist wrote Luke-Acts circa 85 C.E. For his original audience, the destruction of Jerusalem and the Second Temple was recent history. Whatever Jesus said, the interpretative framing of his life and teachings circa 85 C.E. came via a particular lens.
When I read 21:1-6, I read a lament for had been and for the destruction Rome had wrought.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
FEBRUARY 4, 2022 COMMON ERA
THE FEAST OF SAINT CORNELIUS THE CENTURION
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Adoration of the Magi Stamp from Latvia, 1992
Image in the Public Domain
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
According to the Inter-Lutheran Commission on Worship (ILCW) Lectionary (1973), as contained in the Lutheran Book of Worship (1978) and Lutheran Worship (1982)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Isaiah 60:1-6
Psalm 72
Ephesians 3:2-12
Matthew 2:1-12
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Lord God, on this day you revealed your Son
to the nations by the leading of a star.
Lead us now by faith to know your presence in our lives,
and bring us at last to the full vision of your glory,
through your Son, Jesus Christ our Lord,
who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and forever. Amen.
—Lutheran Book of Worship (1978), 15
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
O God, by the leading of a star you once made known
to all nations your only-begotten Son;
now lead us, who know you by faith,
to know in heaven the fullness of your divine goodness;
through Jesus Christ, our Lord, who lives and reigns with
you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and forever. Amen.
—Lutheran Worship (1982), 20
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Third Isaiah, in Isaiah 60, applied motifs of the Davidic Dynasty, not to the Messiah, but to the Israelite nation as a whole. (The “you” in Isaiah 60:1-6 is plural.) There is no Messiah in Third Isaiah, which teaches that in the future, God will rule directly on Earth.
Yet we have this assigned reading on the Feast of the Epiphany, about Jesus, the Messiah.
Psalm 72, originally for a coronation, describes the ideal Davidic monarch. He will govern justly, defend the oppressed, crush the extortioners, and revere God, we read. His renown spreads far and wide, we read. These sentences describe few of the Davidic monarchs. They do not even describe King David. The Christian tradition of reading Jesus into every nook and cranny of the Hebrew Bible interprets Jesus as the ultimate fulfillment of the text, though.
Call me a heretic if you wish, O reader, but I resist the tendency to read Jesus into every nook and cranny of the Hebrew Bible. Call me a heretic if you wish; I will accept the label with pride. I even own a t-shirt that reads:
HERETIC.
Father Raymond E. Brown, whom I admire and some of whose books I own, argued against the historicity of the birth narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. I take this point while disagreeing with another one: Brown considered the account in the Gospel of Luke closer to reality than the one in the Gospel of Matthew. I reverse that. I posit that there may have been a natural phenomenon (poetically, a star) that attracted the attention of some Persian astrologers. This scenario seems plausible.
I, being a detail-oriented person, as well as a self-identified heretic, also wince at the depictions of the shepherds and the Magi together at Bethlehem. Even if one mistakes the germane accounts in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke for historical stories, one may notice that up to two years separated the stories. St. Dionysius Exiguus, for all his piety, counted badly. Herod the Great died in 4 B.C.E. If one accepts the Massacre of the (Holy) Innocents as being plausible (as I do), then one may wish to notice that the Roman client king ordered the deaths of boys two years old and younger at Bethlehem. This story, therefore, places the birth of Jesus circa 6 B.C.E. Either way, St. Dionysius Exiguus still place the birth of Jesus “Before Christ.” (This is why I use B.C.E. and C.E.)
Whoever wrote or dictated the Epistle to the Ephesians, I am grateful to St. Paul the Apostle, the great evangelist to the Gentiles. I, as a Gentile, am happy to be in the club of Christ. I also acknowledge that I, as a Christian, stand on the shoulders of Judaism, a faith I refuse to malign.
The Epiphany–set on the old Eastern date of Christmas–reminds us that God seeks to attract as many followers as possible. We Gentiles, grafted onto the tree of faith, need to remember that we are a branch, not the trunk, of that tree. The limits of divine mercy exist, but I do not know where the borders are. I assume that Judaism and Christianity are the two true faiths. Yet I do not presume to know who God’s “secret friends”–secret to me–are.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
JANUARY 17, 2022 COMMON ERA
THE FEAST OF SAINT ANTONY OF EGYPT, ROMAN CATHOLIC ABBOT AND FATHER OF WESTERN MONASTICISM
THE FEAST OF SAINTS DEICOLA AND GALL, ROMAN CATHOLIC MONKS; AND SAINT OTHMAR, ROMAN CATHOLIC ABBOT AT SAINT GALLEN
THE FEAST OF JAMES WOODROW, SOUTHERN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTER, NATURALIST, AND ALLEGED HERETIC
THE FEAST OF SAINT PACHOMIUS THE GREAT, FOUNDER OF CHRISTIAN COMMUNAL MONASTICISM
THE FEAST OF RUTHERFORD BIRCHARD HAYES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
THE FEAST OF THOMAS A. DOOLEY, U.S. ROMAN CATHOLIC PHYSICIAN AND HUMANITARIAN
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adapted from this post
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: The Disobedient Children, by Carl Jutz der Altere
Image in the Public Domain
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING LUKE-ACTS, PART XXXVI
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Luke 13:31-35
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Lest anyone think that Jesus had negative relations with all Pharisees, consider Luke 13:31-33, O reader. These Pharisees’ warning of the lethal intentions of Herod Antipas seems friendly to Jesus. Elsewhere in the canonical Gospels, one can identify at least two pro-Jesus Pharisees–Sts. Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea–by name.
Herod Antipas, a son of King Herod the Great, was a chip off the old block. Antipas had ordered the arrest of St. John the Baptist. Then Antipas, salivating over Salome, his stepdaughter and this half-grandniece, had ordered the execution of St. John the Baptist. Antipas also wanted that other troublemaker, Jesus, dead.
Jesus was a troublemaker. He made what the late, great John Lewis called “good trouble.”
Jesus was also en route to Jerusalem to die during the week of Passover. Not even Herod Antipas, who Jesus contemptuously called “that fox,” could deter Jesus.
The image of Jesus as a mother hen is striking. This metaphor for God’s relationship to the people of God exists in rabbinic literature and in Deuteronomy 32:11-12; Psalm 36:7; and Isaiah 31:5. In this case, the point is that God has withdrawn divine protection of Jerusalem and perhaps the nation. This reading fits with the status of Jerusalem and Judea circa 85 C.E., after the First Jewish War.
Another way to interpret the metaphor is in the context of the upcoming crucifixion of Jesus. A mother hen protects her chicks with her body during a fire in the barnyard. The chicks live yet the hen dies. Jesus is like the mother hen, and we are like the chicks.
The interpretation of verse 35 varies. It may refer to the Triumphal Entry into Jerusalem, to the Second Coming, or to both. Given the lenses of hindsight and eschatological expectations in the canonical Gospels, “both” may be the correct answer.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
JANUARY 16, 2022 COMMON ERA
THE SECOND SUNDAY AFTER THE EPIPHANY, YEAR C
THE FEAST OF SAINT ROBERTO DE NOBOLI, ROMAN CATHOLIC MISSIONARY IN INDIA
THE FEAST OF SAINT BERARD AND HIS COMPANIONS, ROMAN CATHOLIC MARTYRS IN MOROCCO, 1220
THE FEAST OF EDMUND HAMILTON SEARS, U.S. UNITARIAN MINISTER, HYMN WRITER, AND BIBLICAL SCHOLAR
THE FEAST OF EDWARD BUNNETT, ANGLICAN ORGANIST AND COMPOSER
THE FEAST OF SAINT JUANA MARIA CONDESA LLUCH, FOUNDER OF THE CONGREGATION OF THE HANDMAIDS OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION, PROTECTRESS OF WORKERS
THE FEAST OF TIMOTHY RICHARD MATTHEWS, ANGLICAN PRIEST, ORGANIST, AND HYMN TUNE COMPOSER
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Head of Herod, by Giuseppe Arcimboldo
Image in the Public Domain
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
According to the Inter-Lutheran Commission on Worship (ILCW) Lectionary (1973), as contained in the Lutheran Book of Worship (1978) and Lutheran Worship (1982)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Isaiah 7:10-14 (15-17)
Psalm 24
Romans 1:1-7
Matthew 1:18-25
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Stir up your power, O Lord, and come.
Take away the hindrance of our sins
and make us ready for the celebration of your birth,
that we may receive you in joy and serve you always,
for you live and reign with the Father and the Holy Spirit,
now and forever. Amen.
—Lutheran Book of Worship (1978), 14
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Stir up your power, O Lord, and come among us with great might,
and because we are sorely hindered by our sins,
let your bountiful grace and mercy speedily help and deliver us;
through Jesus Christ, our Lord, who lives and reigns with
you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and forever. Amen.
—Lutheran Worship (1982), 14
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Kings populate the readings for this Sunday.
The kings in Isaiah 7:10-17 were Ahaz and Hezekiah of Judah. Immediately–in context–God was with Judah and the leadership of that kingdom during the Syro-Ephraimite War. The conception of the future King Hezekiah to an almah (young woman) was the sign of this.
YHWH is the King of Glory in Psalm 24.
Jesus was the king in Romans 1:1-7. The death and resurrection of Christ revealed in yet another way that he was the Son of God. (May we avoid the heresy of Adoptionism.)
Herod the Great was a client king of the Roman Empire. To accuse Herod of being mean was to understate reality. The man ordered the deaths of relatives and strangers alike.
Therefore, I, as a historian, attest that the story of the Massacre of the Innocents is plausible. It is consistent with the character of Herod the Great.
Matthew 1:18 quotes and reapplies Jeremiah 31:15, a text about Israel, personified as Rachel, weeping for her lost children, exiles during the Babylonian Exile. Jeremiah 31:16 predicts the return of the exiles, though. There is hope, even if it is deferred sometimes.
That must have been cold comfort to grieving parents, though.
As we approach the twelve days of Christmas, may all of us cling to hope. That hope may seem like cold comfort, especially if we grieve the absence of someone who has died or has not been able to attend for another reason. I need encouragement to cling to hope as much as the next grieving person; I know the feeling of more than one “blue Christmas.” Yet hope abides.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
JANUARY 8, 2022 COMMON ERA
THE FEAST OF SAINT THORFINN OF HAMAR, ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP
THE FEAST OF A. J. MUSTE, DUTCH-AMERICAN MINISTER, LABOR ACTIVIST, AND PACIFIST
THE FEAST OF ARCANGELO CORELLI, ITALIAN ROMAN CATHOLIC MUSICIAN AND COMPOSER
THE FEAST OF NICOLAUS COPERNICUS AND GALILEO GALILEI, SCIENTISTS
THE FEAST OF HARRIET BEDELL, EPISCOPAL DEACONESS AND MISSIONARY
THE FEAST OF SAINT PEPIN OF LANDEN, SAINT ITTA OF METZ, THEIR RELATIONS, AND SAINTS AMAND, AUSTREGISILUS, AND SULPICIUS II OF BOURGES, FAITHFUL CHRISTIANS ACROSS GENERATIONAL LINES
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adapted from this post
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Icon of the Magnificat
Image in the Public Domain
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING LUKE-ACTS, PART III
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Luke 1:5-46
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Consensus among scholars of the New Testament holds that the first two chapters of the Gospel of Luke are the that work in miniature. Luke 1 and 2 introduce themes the rest of that Gospel develops.
Luke 1:5 grounds the audience in time and place. We read the name of the Roman client king: Herod (the Great).
Herod the Great (r. 37-48 B.C.E.) married into the Hasmonean Dynasty and founded his own. The Herodian Dynasty held power (under the Roman aegis) until 70 C.E. Herod the Great, the Governor of Galilee (47-37 B.C.E.), became the King of the Jews in 37 B.C.E. He had authority in Judea and Galilee.
Consider calendars, O reader. Judaism had its calendar. The Romans had their calendar, which started with the founding of Rome–on the B.C.E./B.C.-C.E./A/D. scale, 753 B.C.E./B.C. The B.C.E./B.C.-C.E./A.D. scale dates to what we call the 500s C.E./A.D., when St. Dionysius Exiguus introduced it. I notice that he miscalculated, for St. Dionysius attempted to place the birth of Jesus one week before the beginning of the year 1 Anno Domini (In the Year of Our Lord). Yet Herod the Great died in 4 B.C.E. Consider the account of the Massacre of the Innocents (Matthew 2:16-18). I contend that a tyrant who had been dead for three years could not have ordered that slaughter. I conclude, therefore, that St. Dionysius miscalculated.
I use “Before the Common Era” (B.C.E.) because I refuse to refer to the birth of Jesus as having occurred “Before Christ.”
Much happens, on the surface and beneath it, in these verses. Some of these are:
- We read the identification of St. John the Baptist with Elijah (verse 17), indicating eschatological expectations regarding Jesus.
- St. Elizabeth is reminiscent of Hannah in 1 Samuel 1.
- The Song of Hannah (1 Samuel 2) is the model for the Magnificat.
- We read that St. John the Baptist will go before “him” (verse 17), indicating YHWH, not Jesus.
- We are also supposed to think of Abram/Abraham and Sarai/Sarah (Genesis 15 and 17).
- Being disturbed or afraid when encountering an angel is a Biblical motif.
- The Holy Spirit is a major theme in Luke-Acts. It makes its Lucan debut in 1:35.
- In Hebrew angelology, there are seven archangels. 1 Enoch 19:1-20:8 names them: Gabriel, Suru’el, Raphael (who features in the Book of Tobit), Raguel, Michael, Uriel (who features in 2 Esdras/4 Ezra), and Sarafa’el. An alternative text of 1 Enoch mentions another name, Remiel. Seven, being the number of perfection, may be symbolic. Or Remiel may be an alternative name for one of the archangels.
- The Lucan theme of reversal of fortune is prominent in the Magnificat.
- I recommend consulting Raymond E. Brown, The Birth of the Messiah--Updated Edition (1993), 358-360, for a detailed, line-by-line breakdown of the Magnificat, with citations from the Hebrew Bible, 2 Esdras/4 Ezra, Sirach/Ecclesiasticus, and the Psalms of Solomon.
- Childlessness was, in the culture, always the woman’s fault, regardless of biology.
- St. John the Baptist was certainly just kicking (1:41). Unborn children kick.
- Verses 5-56 are about what God did and how people responded.
Underneath it all is a celebration of God. God has taken the initiative–God the Lord, the saviour, the Powerful One, the Holy One, the Merciful One, the Faithful One. God is the ultimate reason to celebrate.
–N. T. Wright, Advent for Everyone: Luke–A Daily Devotional (2018), 89
I agree.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
DECEMBER 21, 2021 COMMON ERA
THE TWENTY-FOURTH DAY OF ADVENT
THE FEAST OF SAINT THOMAS THE APOSTLE, MARTYR
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Judea Under the Hasmoneans
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING 1, 2 AND 4 MACCABEES
PART XXXI
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 Maccabees 16:11-24
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE DEATH OF SIMON AND THE ACCESSION OF JOHN HYRCANUS I
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: John Hyrcanus I
Image in the Public Domain
The First Book of the Maccabees is primarily the story of the leadership of Mattathias and three of his five sons: Judas Maccabeus, Jonathan, and Simon.
The Hasmonean Dynasty was not immune to the darker side of human nature. Simon had appointed his son-in-law Ptolemeus son of Abubus the commander of the plain of Jericho. Ptolemeus, greedy for wealth and power, plotted to kill Simon and Simon’s sons Mattathias and Judas, drunk, at a banquet. Ptolemeus killed those men, but he did not succeed Simon. Ptolemeus did notify King Antiochus VII Sidetes and request assistance in a coup d’état. Ptolemeus also sent men to execute John Hyrcanus I and seize control of Jerusalem. John Hyrcanus I, warned, escaped, had the would-be-executioners killed, and succeeded his father as the High Priest.
Shortly after John Hyrcanus I died in 104 B.C.E., the anonymous author of 1 Maccabees wrote. The work ended as it began: stife and infighting. 1 Maccabees, a riveting story (and a good read, especially in The Revised English Bible, 1989), is a cautionary tale. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE REST OF THE STORY
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
For the full version of the rest of the story, consult Flavius Josephus, O reader.
John Hyrcanus I conquered Moab and Samaria. He also ordered the destruction of the temple at Gerazim. He died of natural causes.

Above: Aristobolus I
Image in the Public Domain
Aristobolus I (reigned 104-103 B.C.E.) succeeded his father and assumed the title of king. King Aristobolus I had his brother and mother killed.

Above: Alexander Jannaeus
Image in the Public Domain
Alexander Jannaeus (reigned 103-76 B.C.E.), another son of John Hyrcanus I, succeeded Aristobolus as the High Priest and the king. Alexander Jannaeus married Salome Alexandra. During his reign, strife between Pharisees and Sadducees divided the kingdom.

Above: Salome Alexandra
Image in the Public Domain
Salome Alexandra (reigned 76-67 B.C.E.) succeeded as the queen. During these years, Hyrcanus II, son of Alexander Jannaeus and Alexandra, served as the High Priest.

Above: Hyrcanus II
Image in the Public Domain
Hyrcanus II briefly reigned as king (67 B.C.E.) after the death of Salome Alexandra.

Above: Aristobolus II
Image in the Public Domain
Aristooolus II (reigned 67-33 B.C.E.) had struggled with his brother Hyrcanus II for years. The two brothers continued their struggle, transformed into a civil war, after Aristobolus took over. The Roman Republic intervened in the civil war, first on the side of Aristobolus II. Then the Romans deposed Aristobolus II and removed him to Rome in 63 B.C.E. Roman General Pompey installed Hyrcanus II as the High Priest. Yet the real ruler of Judea, was minister Antipater, who worked for the Roman Republic. Judean independence had ended.
Rebellions ensued. Hyrcanus II and Antipater worked for the Roman Republic. Julius Caesar appointed Hyrcanus II an ethnarch (47-41 B.C.E.). Antipater died of poisoning in 43 B.C.E.

Above: Antigonus II Mattathias
Image in the Public Domain
Herod the Great, son of Antipater, entered the picture. Herod and his brother Phasael served as Roman tetrarchs in 41-40 B.C.E. Then the Parthians installed Antigonus II Mattathias, brother of Hyrcanus II, as the Judean king and the High Priest. Phasael committed suicide. Herod fled to Rome. High Priest Hyrcanus II became a mutilated (no ears) captive in the Parthian Empire. The struggle between Herod the Great and Antigonus II Mattathias ended in 37 B.C.E. Herod reigned as a Roman client king until he died in 4 B.C.E.

Above: Mariamne I
Image in the Public Domain
Herod the Great married into the Hasmonean Dynasty, merging that family with his. He married Mariamne I, granddaughter of Aristobolus II and Hyrcanus II, in 37 B.C.E. Then Herod the great began to execute Hasmoneans:
- High Priest Aristobolus III (d. 35 B.C.E.)
- Hyrcanus II (d. 30 B.C.E.)
- Mariamne I (d. 29 B.C.E.)
- Alexandra, mother of Mariamne I (d. 28 B.C.E.)
- Alexander, son of Herod the Great and Mariamne I (d. 7 B.C.E.)
- Aristobolus, son of Herod the Great and Mariamne I (d. 7 B.C.E.)
Consider the account of the Massacre of the Innocents (Matthew 2:16-18), O reader. It is consistent with the character of Herod the Great.
Herod the Great, at the end of his life, had terminated the male line of the Hasmonean Dynasty. Yet the Hasmonean genetic heritage continued. The three daughters of Herod the Great and Mariamne continued to live. Furthermore, Aristobolus, the strangled son of Herod the Great and Mariamne I, had a daughter, Herodias. She had a daughters, Salome. Herodias persuaded Salome to request the head of St. John the Baptist (Matthew 14:1-12). Herod Agrippa I was a client king of the Roman Empire from 37 to 44 B.C.E. He persecuted Christians, and died in Acts 12:22-23. His son, Herod Agrippa II, ruled as a Roman client king (50-100 B.C.E.). He died childless. With him the Herodian Dynasty ended.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
EVALUATION
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
So, as we–you, O reader, and I–stand at the end of this series and ponder the Hasmoneans and their legacy, we ask, what was their legacy? Robert Doran’s answer may prove useful.
…the author also acknowledges that the Maccabees had been the family through whom God had wrought deliverance in Israel. He emphasizes that God does act faithfully to the people if they attempt to follow God’s commandments. Torah faithfulness, a longing to serve God at the Temple and at the place God has chosen, vibrates throughout [1 Maccabees]. One may question whether today one should follow the same war tactics as Judas and his brothers did; one may be dismayed at the open acceptance of ethnic cleansing as a means to follow God’s commandments. But one cannot question whether the Maccabees fought according to their own convictions to keep alive the worship of the God of Israel. For that, their name will be remembered.
—The New Interpreter’s Bible, Volume IV (1996), 178
Doran wrote at the end of 1 Maccabees, when, as he put it:
The heady days of the opening revolt against the Seleucids have been replaced by Hasmonean institutionalization.
–178
Hasmonean institutionalization watered the seeds of destruction the sons of the old priest Mattathias had planted. Good intentions paved the road to hell. And Herod the Great brought down the final curtain upon the Hasmonean Dynasty.
Thank you, O reader, for joining me on this journey through the First, Second, and Fourth Books of the Maccabees. It has been an intellectually and spiritually rewarding project for me. (There is seldom a line separating the spiritual and the intellectual for me, actually.) I pray that this reading project has had a similar benefit for you.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
FEBRUARY 16, 2021 COMMON ERA
THE FEAST OF PHILIPP MENANCTHON, GERMAN LUTHERAN THEOLOGIAN AND SCRIBE OF THE REFORMATION
THE FEAST OF CHARLES TODD QUINTARD, EPISCOPAL BISHOP OF TENNESSEE
THE FEAST OF CHRISTIAN FREDERICK MARTIN, SR., AND CHARLES AUGUSTUS ZOEBISCH, GERMAN-AMERICAN INSTRUMENT MAKERS
THE FEAST OF LOUIS (LEWIS) F. KAMPMANN, U.S. MORAVIAN MINISTER, MISSIONARY, AND HYMN TRANSLATOR
THE FEAST OF NICHOLAS KASATKIN, ORTHODOX BISHOP OF ALL JAPAN
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Herod Agrippa I
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
For the Twenty-Fifth Sunday after Trinity, Year 1
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Lectionary from A Book of Worship for Free Churches (The General Council of the Congregational Christian Churches in the United States, 1948)
Collect from The Book of Worship (Evangelical and Reformed Church, 1947)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Almighty God, we beseech thee, show thy mercy unto thy humble servants,
that we who put no trust in our own merits may not be dealt with
after the severity of thy judgment, but according to thy mercy;
through Jesus Christ, thy Son, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth
with thee and the Holy Spirit, ever One God, world without end. Amen.
—The Book of Worship (1947), 231
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Isaiah 35:4-10
Psalm 119:129-144
2 Thessalonians 2:1-12
Luke 19:11-26
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
God, who vanquishes the wicked and redeems the oppressed, balances judgment and mercy. The redemption of the oppressed is mercy for the oppressed and judgment of the oppressors. In a real sense, oppressors doom themselves. They do not have to be oppressors, after all. The redemption of the oppressed may come in this life or the next one, but it will come. God is faithful.
Now I will focus on the Gospel lesson. The Parable of the Pounds may seem like a parallel version of the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14-30), but it is not. The Parable of the Talents is about personal spiritual responsibility. The New Interpreter’s Bible, Volume IX (1995), labels Luke 19:11-27 as the “Parable of the Greedy and Vengeful King.”
Follow the proverbial bouncing balls with me, O reader.
Herod the Great (reigned 47-4 B.C.E.), a Roman client king, had died, leaving sons:
- Archelaus;
- Herod Antipas, full brother of Archelaus; and
- Philip (the Tetrarch), half-brother of Archelaus and Herod Antipas.
Archelaus wanted to succeed his father as a client king. Before he departed for Rome, Archelaus had about 3000 people killed. A delegation of 50 Jews also went to Rome, to argue against Archelaus’s petition to Emperor Augustus. The emperor made Archelaus the Ethnarch of Idumea, Judea, and Samaria instead. Archelaus was too brutal, even by Roman imperial standards. Augustus deposed him in 6 C.E. and exiled the would-be-king to Gaul.
Herod Antipas served as the Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea from 4 B.C.E. to 39 C.E. He ordered the execution of St. John the Baptist, who had objected to the incestuous marriage to Herodias. (She was the former wife of Philip the Tetrarch, as well as as Herod Antipas’s half-niece. Salome was, therefore, Herod Antipas’s step-daughter and great-half-niece.)
Philip was the Tetrarch of Northern Transjordan from 4 B.C.E. to 34 C.E. His territory became Herod Agrippa I’s realm in 37 C.E. (Herod Agrippa I was Philip’s half-nephew and Herodias’s brother.) Herod Agrippa I held the title of king from 37 to 44 C.E.
The transfer of that territory to Herod Agrippa I made Herodias jealous. So did the act by which Emperor Tiberius had granted Lysanius, the Tetrarch of Abilene, the title of king in 34 C.E. (Lysanius was not a member of the Herodian Dynasty.) Herodias and Herod Antipas traveled to Rome in 39 C.E. to request that Caligula grant Herod Antipas the title of king, too. Herod Agrippa I sent emissaries to oppose that petition. Caligula deposed Herod Antipas and exiled the couple to Gaul. The emperor also added the territory of Herod Antipas to that of Herod Agrippa I. Then, in 41 C.E., Emperor Claudius (I) added Judea and Samaria to the realm of Herod Agrippa I. Herod Agrippa died in 44 C.E.
Jesus and his audience knew the story of Archelaus, the model for the would-be-king in the Parable of the Pounds/Greedy and Vengeful King. Likewise, the original audience for the Gospel of Luke (written circa 85 C.E.) knew the story of Herod Antipas’s ill-fated quest for the title of king. They brought that story to this parable, too.
Not every parable of Jesus features a stand-in for God. The newly-appointed king in the parable was not a role model. The parable presents us with a study in contrasts between two kingdoms–the kingdom of this world and the Kingdom of God. The kingdom of this world depends on violence, exploitation, injustice, and artificial scarcity. The Kingdom of God is the polar opposite of the kingdom of this world.
R. Alan Culpepper, writing about this parable in The New Interpreter’s Bible, Volume IX (1995), 364, proposes that
The enemies of the kingdom of God will be punished no less severely than if they had opposed one of the Herods, but in God’s kingdom the greedy will be driven out of the Temple and the generous will be rewarded.
After all, we reap what we sow.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
MAY 2, 2020 COMMON ERA
THE FEAST OF SAINT ALEXANDER OF ALEXANDRIA, PATRIARCH; AND SAINT ATHANASIUS OF ALEXANDRIA, PATRIARCH AND “FATHER OF ORTHODOXY”
THE FEAST OF CHARLES SILVESTER HORNE, ENGLISH CONGREGATIONALIST MINISTER AND HYMN WRITER
THE FEAST OF CHARLES FRIEDRICH HASSE, GERMAN-BRITISH MORAVIAN COMPOSER AND EDUCATOR
THE FEAST OF JULIA BULKLEY CADY CORY, U.S. PRESBYTERIAN HYMN WRITER
THE FEAST OF SAINT SIGISMUND OF BURGUNDY, KING; SAINT CLOTILDA, FRANKISH QUEEN; AND SAINT CLODOALD, FRANKISH PRINCE AND ABBOT
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Archelaus
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Blessed Lord, who caused all holy Scriptures to be written for our learning:
Grant us so to hear them, read, mark, learn, and inwardly digest them,
that we may embrace and ever hold fast the blessed hope of life,
which you have given us in our Savior Jesus Christ, who lives and reigns
with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.
—The Book of Common Prayer (1979), page 236
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 Samuel 31:1-9 or Lamentations 3:1-9, 14-33
Psalm 114
Romans 15:14-33
Luke 19:11-27
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
As I have written many times, the judgment and mercy of God exist in a balance of justice/righteousness. (As I have also written ad infinitum, justice and righteousness are the same word in the Bible. I keep repeating myself.) Mercy for the persecuted and oppressed may be judgment on the persecutors and oppressors. Actions and inaction have consequences. Not serving God has negative consequences. Serving God may have some negative consequences in this life, but God rewards the faithful in the afterlife.
Now I will focus on the Gospel lesson. The Parable of the Pounds may seem like a parallel version of the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14-30), but it is not. The Parable of the Talents is about personal spiritual responsibility. The New Interpreter’s Bible, Volume IX (1995), labels Luke 19:11-27 as the “Parable of the Greedy and Vengeful King.”
Follow the proverbial bouncing balls with me, O reader.
Herod the Great (reigned 47-4 B.C.E.), a Roman client king, had died, leaving sons:
- Archelaus;
- Herod Antipas, full brother of Archelaus; and
- Philip (the Tetrarch), half-brother of Archelaus and Herod Antipas.
Archelaus wanted to succeed his father as a client king. Before he departed for Rome, Archelaus had about 3000 people killed. A delegation of 50 Jews also went to Rome, to argue against Archelaus’s petition to Emperor Augustus. The emperor made Archelaus the Ethnarch of Idumea, Judea, and Samaria instead. Archelaus was too brutal, even by Roman imperial standards. Augustus deposed him in 6 C.E. and exiled the would-be-king to Gaul.
Herod Antipas served as the Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea from 4 B.C.E. to 39 C.E. He ordered the execution of St. John the Baptist, who had objected to the incestuous marriage to Herodias. (She was the former wife of Philip the Tetrarch, as well as as Herod Antipas’s half-niece. Salome was, therefore, Herod Antipas’s step-daughter and great-half-niece.)
Philip was the Tetrarch of Northern Transjordan from 4 B.C.E. to 34 C.E. His territory became Herod Agrippa I’s realm in 37 C.E. (Herod Agrippa I was Philip’s half-nephew and Herodias’s brother.) Herod Agrippa I held the title of king from 37 to 44 C.E.
The transfer of that territory to Herod Agrippa I made Herodias jealous. So did the act by which Emperor Tiberius had granted Lysanius, the Tetrarch of Abilene, the title of king in 34 C.E. (Lysanius was not a member of the Herodian Dynasty.) Herodias and Herod Antipas traveled to Rome in 39 C.E. to request that Caligula grant Herod Antipas the title of king, too. Herod Agrippa I sent emissaries to oppose that petition. Caligula deposed Herod Antipas and exiled the couple to Gaul. The emperor also added the territory of Herod Antipas to that of Herod Agrippa I. Then, in 41 C.E., Emperor Claudius (I) added Judea and Samaria to the realm of Herod Agrippa I. Herod Agrippa died in 44 C.E.
Jesus and his audience knew the story of Archelaus, the model for the would-be-king in the Parable of the Pounds/Greedy and Vengeful King. Likewise, the original audience for the Gospel of Luke (written circa 85 C.E.) knew the story of Herod Antipas’s ill-fated quest for the title of king. They brought that story to this parable, too.
Not every parable of Jesus features a stand-in for God. The newly-appointed king in the parable was not a role model. The parable presents us with a study in contrasts between two kingdoms–the kingdom of this world and the Kingdom of God. The kingdom of this world depends on violence, exploitation, injustice, and artificial scarcity. The Kingdom of God is the polar opposite of the kingdom of this world.
R. Alan Culpepper, writing about this parable in The New Interpreter’s Bible, Volume IX (1995), 364, proposes that
The enemies of the kingdom of God will be punished no less severely than if they had opposed one of the Herods, but in God’s kingdom the greedy will be driven out of the Temple and the generous will be rewarded.
After all, we reap what we sow.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
MAY 2, 2020 COMMON ERA
THE FEAST OF SAINT ALEXANDER OF ALEXANDRIA, PATRIARCH; AND SAINT ATHANASIUS OF ALEXANDRIA, PATRIARCH AND “FATHER OF ORTHODOXY”
THE FEAST OF CHARLES SILVESTER HORNE, ENGLISH CONGREGATIONALIST MINISTER AND HYMN WRITER
THE FEAST OF CHARLES FRIEDRICH HASSE, GERMAN-BRITISH MORAVIAN COMPOSER AND EDUCATOR
THE FEAST OF JULIA BULKLEY CADY CORY, U.S. PRESBYTERIAN HYMN WRITER
THE FEAST OF SAINT SIGISMUND OF BURGUNDY, KING; SAINT CLOTILDA, FRANKISH QUEEN; AND SAINT CLODOALD, FRANKISH PRINCE AND ABBOT
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adapted from this post:
https://ordinarytimedevotions.wordpress.com/2020/05/02/devotion-for-proper-28-year-c-humes/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Journey of the Magi
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
For the Feast of the Epiphany, Year 1
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Lectionary from A Book of Worship for Free Churches (The General Council of the Congregational Christian Churches in the United States, 1948)
Collect from The Book of Worship (Evangelical and Reformed Church, 1947)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
O God, who by the leading of a star didst manifest thy only begotten Son to the Gentiles;
mercifully grant, that, we, who know thee now by faith,
may after this life have the fruition of thy glorious Godhead;
through the same Jesus Christ, thy Son, our Lord,
who liveth and reigneth with thee and the Holy Spirit,
ever one God, world without end. Amen.
—The Book of Worship (1947), 123
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Isaiah 42:1-12
Psalm 145
2 Corinthians 3:18-4:6
Matthew 2:1-12
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I the LORD, in My grace, have summoned you,
And I have grasped you by the hand.
I created you, and appointed you
A covenant people, a light of nations–
Opening eyes deprived of light,
Rescuing prisoners from confinement,
From the dungeon those who sit in darkness.
–Isaiah 42:6-7a, TANAKH: The Holy Scriptures (1985)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The assigned readings for this feast day speak of God’s love for all people and of our human responsibilities to each other and to God. Notice, O reader, that the audience for Isaiah 42:5f is collective, not individual. We who carry Western individualism wherever we go need to check it at the door when reading texts that do not come from that assumption. Psalm 145 tells us that God is just in all His ways, that God sustains those who fall and lifts up all who are bent double. That example tells us what our character should approach, does it not?
Herod the Great was a terrible man. He, a client king within the Roman Empire, had relatives and strangers killed, so he could maintain power. The young Jesus constituted a threat to Herod, whose political legitimacy was questionable. The client king appeased certain religious authorities by sponsoring the expansion of the Second Temple, but that long-term construction project could not hide his perfidy. Herod was a negative example.
Jesus is the ultimate positive example, though. He is the one into whose likeness we, by grace, are coming to resemble more and more as time passes. He is the one we must proclaim, if we are to lead Christian lives. Christ is the light that properly shines through our lives in the darkness of the world.
Does that light threaten us or attract us? Does it shine in our lives? Is it apparent in both our words and our deeds? I mean “our” and “us” both collectively and individually, for the audience for Isaiah 42:5f was a covenant people, and society consists of people. When enough people change their lives, society changes. But does it change for better or for worse?
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
MARCH 13, 2020 COMMON ERA
THE FEAST OF YVES CONGAR, ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIEST AND THEOLOGIAN
THE FEAST OF SAINT HELDRAD, ROMAN CATHOLIC ABBOT
THE FEAST OF JAMES THEODORE HOLLY, EPISCOPAL BISHOP OF HAITI, AND OF THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC; FIRST AFRICAN-AMERICAN BISHOP IN THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH
THE FEAST OF SAINTS PLATO OF SYMBOLEON AND THEODORE STUDITES, EASTERN ORTHODOX ABBOTS; AND SAINT NICEPHORUS OF CONSTANTINOPLE, PATRIARCH
THE FEAST OF SAINT RODERIC OF CABRA AND SOLOMON OF CORDOBA, ROMAN CATHOLIC MARTYRS, 857
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You must be logged in to post a comment.