Archive for the ‘2 Chronicles 17’ Tag

Above: Map of the Assyrian Empire and Its Neighbors
Image Scanned from an Old Bible
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING AMOS, PART II
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Amos 1:3-2:3
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Introduction
As I read the Book of Amos, I ask myself how much of the final version is original to the text from the prophet. I know that the final version of the Book of Amos dates to the 400s B.C.E., three centuries after the time of the prophet. Nevertheless, that question, germane for some matters of interpretation, is irrelevant for other matters of interpretation. The message(s) of the Book of Amos for people, cultures, societies, and institutions in 2021 C.E. are what they are, regardless of which layer of composition to which a particular passage belongs.
Amos 1:3-2:16 consists of prophetic oracles of judgment against nations. I choose to write about the oracles against Judah and Israel in the next post. In this post, I focus on divine judgment against Aram, Philistia, Tyre, Edom, Ammon, and Moab.
Notice, O reader, a motif:
For three crimes of _____, and now four–
I will not take it back–….
–Amos 1:3, 6, 9, 11, 13; 2:1, The New American Bible–Revised Edition (2011)
This motif indicates the end of divine patience after the third crime. Divine patience is not infinite. Divine judgment and mercy exist in balance.
Amos 1:3-2:3 condemns neighboring nations for behavior that is anti-human or against nature. These Gentiles, not being under the Law of Moses, had no covenant with God to keep. They were still accountable according to certain standards, though.
Aram (1:3-5)
Aram was where Syria is today. Aram was the main rival of the Assyrian Empire during the time of the prophets Amos, Hosea, Micah, and (First) Isaiah. Aram was also a frequent foe of the (northern) Kingdom of Israel.
Aram had “threshed Gilead with sledges of iron,” a reference to a military campaign (2 Kings 13:3-7). King Hazael came to power circa 842 B.C.E. and reigned until circa 806 B.C.E. (2 Kings 8:7-15). He founded a dynasty. Hazael’s immediate successor was his son, King Ben-hadad II (2 Kings 13:3). Hadad was a storm god, and “Ben” meant “son of.”
“Aven” meant “evil,” so the Valley of Aven was the “Valley of Evil.” Beth-eden was an Aramaic city-state between the Euphrates and Balikh Rivers. According to Amos 1:5, God would depose the King of Beth-eden and exile the Arameans. During the Syro-Ephraimite War (734-732 B.C.E.; 2 Kings 15:27-31; 2 Kings 16:1-19; 2 Chronicles 28:1-26; Isaiah 7:1-8:23), King Pekah of Israel (r. 735-732 B.C.E.) and King Rezin of Aram (r. 750-732 B.C.E.), having formed an anti-Assyrian alliance, fought the (southern) Kingdom of Judah and besieged Jerusalem because King Ahaz (r. 743/735-727/715 B.C.E.) refused to join that coalition. King Ahaz of Judah turned not to God, but to the Assyrian Empire. That empire conquered part of Aram and reduced Israel to vassalage in 732 B.C.E. The Assyrian Empire ended Aram’s existence as an independent kingdom in 720 B.C.E. That empire relocated Arameans throughout the Assyrian Empire, including in Samaria (2 Kings 17:24, 30).
Philistia (1:6-8
Philistia was on the Mediterranean coast and east of the (southern) Kingdom of Judah. Philistia was where the Gaza Strip is today. Philistines were the people otherwise known as Phoenicians.
Philistia had “exiled an entire population,” probably from Israel or Judah. This raid, perhaps during the reign (817-800 B.C.E.; 2 Kings 13:1-25) of King Jehoahaz of Israel, violated Exodus 21:16, not that the covenant applied to the Philistines.
Tyre (1:9-10)
Tyre, on the Mediterranean coast, was the chief Phoenician city in the middle 700s B.C.E. It was a wealthy commercial capital of a trading network.
Tyre had violated a treaty with an unnamed partner and handed an entire population over to slave markets in Edom.
Edom (1:11-12)
Edom was south of the Dead Sea, in what is now the southern regions of Israel and Jordan. Edom was the nation, by tradition, descended from Esau, a.k.a. Edom (Genesis 25:25-28:9; 32:3-33:16; 35:1-43; 36:1-43). Jacob/Israel had made their peace (Genesis 33), but their descendants had continued the conflict.
Edom, the nation, had pursued his “brother” (Israel) with the sword. Edom, the nation, was metaphorically the brother of the Israelite people (Numbers 20:14; Deuteronomy 2:4; Deuteronomy 23:7; Obadiah 10, 12). King David had added Edom to the (united) Kingdom of Israel (2 Samuel 8:13f; 1 Kings 11:15-17). Edom, part of the (southern) Kingdom of Judah after the division of the (united) Kingdom of Israel, threw off Judean control during the reign (851-853 B.C.E.) of King Jehoram (Joram) (2 Kings 8:16-24; 2 Chronicles 21:4-20). Yet Judah reconquered Edom during the reign (798-769 B.C.E.) of King Amaziah of Judah (2 Kings 14:1-22; 2 Chronicles 25:1-28) and the reign (785-733 B.C.E.) of King Azariah/Uzziah of Judah (2 Kings 15:1-7; 2 Chronicles 26:1-23), contemporary with the time of the prophets Hosea, Amos, and Micah. Edomites persisted in their anger; they raged in wrath without end.
Ammon (1:13-15)
Ammon was to the west of the River Jordan and north of the Dead Sea, in modern-day Jordan. Ammon had been part of the (united) Kingdom of Israel under Kings David and Solomon. The Ammonites had broken away circa 928 B.C.E., when the (united) Kingdom of Israel split into the (northern) Kingdom of Israel and the (southern) Kingdom of Judah.
Ammon had “ripped open pregnant women in Gilead, in order to extend their territory” (Amos 1:13). Ammon had fought a border war with Israel, probably during the 800s B.C.E. In the course of that conflict, Ammonite soldiers had ripped open pregnant women, a tactic not unheard of, sadly.
Ammon became a vassal state (742-630 B.C.E.) of the Assyrian Empire then a province thereof. With the Chaldean/Neo-Babylonian conquest of the Assyrian Empire, Ammon became a rebellious province of the Chaldean/Neo-Babylonian Empire. The rebellion failed, and mass deportations ensued.
Moab (2:1-3)
Moab was west of the Dead Sea, in modern-day Jordan. Moab had been a vassal state of the (united) Kingdom of Israel under Kings David and Solomon then under the kings of the (northern) Kingdom of Israel. King Mesha of Moab had successfully rebelled against vassalage during the reign (851-842 B.C.E) of King Jehoram (Joram) of Israel (1 Kings 3:1-27) and the reign (870-846 B.C.E.) of King Jehoshaphat of Judah (1 Kings 22:1-51; 2 Kings 3:1-27; 2 Chronicles 17:1-20:37). Moab was also the homeland of Ruth.
Moab had “burned to ashes the bones of Edom’s king.” This was an extreme disrespect usually reserved criminals (Genesis 38:24; Leviticus 20:14; Leviticus 21:9), not that Moabites were subject to the Law of Moses. This act, which had no effect on either the (northern) Kingdom of Israel or the (southern) Kingdom of Judah, was still a crime against God.
Moab came under Assyrian domination (c. 735 B.C.E.), became an Assyrian province (711 B.C.E.), and finally ceased to be a state (circa 600 B.C.E.). (For more about the decline and fall of Moab, read Isaiah 15-16 and Jeremiah 48.)
Conclusion
A spiritual mentor of mine liked to read some portion of the Bible then ask:
What is really going on here?
God, who is sovereign over all the nations, does not tolerate injustice. The Book of Amos beats the drum repeatedly. God cares deeply about how people, cultures, societies, and institutions treat people.
In this post, I have focused on neighbors of the (northern) Kingdom of Israel and the (southern) Kingdom of Judah. Many of the prophet’s original audience probably delighted to hear these proclamations of divine judgment against these foreign nations.
Then Amos stopped preaching and started meddling, so to speak.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
MAY 20, 2021 COMMON ERA
THE FEAST OF SAINT ALCUIN OF YORK, ABBOT OF TOURS
THE FEAST OF SAINTS COLUMBA OF RIETI AND OSANNA ANDREASI, DOMINICAN MYSTICS
THE FEAST OF JOHN ELIOT, “THE APOSTLE TO THE INDIANS”
THE FEAST OF SAINT MARIÁ ANGÉLICA LATHROP, FOUNDRESS OF THE DOMINICAN SISTERS OF HAWTHORNE
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: The Death of Ahab
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING 1-2 SAMUEL, 1 KINGS, 2 KINGS 1-21, 1 CHRONICLES, AND 2 CHRONICLES 1-33
PART LXXVII
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 Kings 22:1-50
2 Chronicles 17:1-18:34
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sovereignty passes from nation to nation
on account of injustice and insolence and wealth.
How can he who is dust and ashes be proud?
for even in life his bowels decay.
A long illness baffles the physician;
the king of today will die tomorrow.
For when a man is dead,
he will inherit creeping things, and wild beasts, and worms.
The beginning of man’s pride is to depart from the Lord,
his heart has forsaken his Maker.
–Ecclesiasticus/Sirach 10:8-12, Revised Standard Version–Second Catholic Edition (2002)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
King Ahab of Israel (Reigned 873-852 B.C.E.)
King Ben-Hadad I of Aram (Reigned 880-842 B.C.E)
King Jehoshaphat of Judah (Reigned 870-846 B.C.E.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
After the interlude in 1 Kings 21, the narrative left hanging at the end of 1 Kings 20 resumes.
King Ahab of Israel and King Jehoshaphat of Judah had much in common. King Jehoshaphat’s son and heir, Jehoram/Joram (reigned 851-843 B.C.E.) had married Athaliah, the daughter of King Ahab and Queen Jezebel (2 Kings 8:18). (Athaliah reigned in Judah from 842 to 836 B.C.E. Read 2 Kings 11:1-20, O reader.) And Kings Ahab and Jehoshaphat shared an enemy–King Ben-Hadad I of Aram.
The verdict on King Jehoshaphat on the Bible is mixed. 2 Chronicles 17 opens by explaining that he was a good ruler zealous for the Law of Moses. One reads of the strong geopolitical position of Judah and of the monarch’s increasing wealth. Yet one reads of the alliance (marital, political, and military) with King Ahab. And one notes the Chronicler’s disapproval of that alliance.
As I have commented in other Biblical contexts, certain texts certain words without explicitly stating the speaker’s tone of voice. This is unfortunate, for tone of voice is frequently crucial in determining meaning. Sometimes, however, a text contains hints regarding tone of voice. One may safely assume, in context, for example, that when the prophet Micaiah spoke in favor of attacking Ramoth-gilead, he did so sarcastically.
As for the false prophets, according to Micaiah, God spoke through them to lie to King Ahab, to tell the King of Israel what he (Ahab) wanted to hear, to lead to his (Ahab’s) death. And Ahab died in battle.
Meanwhile, King Jehoshaphat of Judah reigned for a few more years. And Ahaziah, son of Ahab, became the King of Israel.
One of the recurring themes in the readings for this post is God deceiving people. Whenever the Hebrew Bible mentions God lying, a text makes clear that somebody deserved it. The context may be to deliver Hebrews from an enemy or to complete divine judgment previously pronounced. One makes of these stories what one will. These accounts are what they are.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
OCTOBER 27, 2020 COMMON ERA
THE FEAST OF JAMES A. WALSH AND THOMAS PRICE, COFOUNDERS OF THE MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS; AND MARY JOSEPHINE ROGERS, FOUNDRESS OF THE MARYKNOLL SISTERS OF SAINT DOMINIC
THE FEAST OF DMITRY BORTNIANSKY, RUSSIAN ORTHODOX COMPOSER
THE FEAST OF HARRY WEBB FARRINGTON, U.S. METHODIST MINISTER AND HYMN WRITER
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: Abner
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
READING 1-2 SAMUEL, 1 KINGS, 2 KINGS 1-21, 1 CHRONICLES, AND 2 CHRONICLES 1-33
PART XXIX
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 Samuel 2:1-32
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Do you indeed decree righteousness, you rulers?
do you judge the peoples with equity?
No; you devise evil in your hearts,
and your hands deal out violence in the land.
–Psalm 58:1-2, The Book of Common Prayer (1979)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 Chronicles 11:1-3 skips over years of civil war (2 Samuel 2-4) and jumps to 2 Samuel 5:1-5. Civil war? What civil war? There was a civil war?
Yes, there was.
David became the King of Judah after the death of Saul, the King of Israel. Ishbaal/Ishbosheth, one of Saul’s surviving sons, became the King of Israel. Ishbaal (“Man of Baal”) was his given name. Ishbosheth (“Man of shame”) was an editorial comment. Ishbaal/Ishbosheth reigned for about two years.
Aside: On occasion, “Baal” functioned as a synonym for YHWH, as in 2 Samuel 5:20. Usually, though, it referred to a Canaanite deity, often Baal Peor, the storm/fertility god. “Baal” mean “Lord.” Some Biblical texts referred to “the Baals” (Judges 2:11; Judges 3:7; Judges 8:33; Judges 10:6; Judges 10:10; 1 Samuel 7:4; 1 Samuel 12:10; 1 Kings 18:18; 2 Chronicles 17:3; 2 Chronicles 24:7; 2 Chronicles 28:2; 2 Chronicles 33:3; 2 Chronicles 34:4; Jeremiah 2:33; Jeremiah 9:14; Hosea 2:13: Hosea 2:17; and Hosea 11:2).
The civil war began at Gibeon. Abner served as the general loyal to Ishbaal/Ishbosheth. Joab was David’s general. The forces under Joab’s command won the first battle.
The narrative emphasizes the legitimacy of David as monarch. God was on David’s side, according to the text; Abner’s forces had a higher death toll.
Abner’s question, from the context of those high casualties, remains applicable.
Must the sword devour forever?
–2 Samuel 2:26a, TANAKH: The Holy Scriptures (1985)
How long will the sword, tank, missile, drone, bullet, et cetera, devour?
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
AUGUST 30, 2020 COMMON ERA
PROPER 17: THE THIRTEENTH SUNDAY AFTER PENTECOST, YEAR A
THE FEAST OF SAINT JEANNE JUGAN, FOUNDRESS OF THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR
THE FEAST OF JOHN LEARY, U.S. ROMAN CATHOLIC SOCIAL ACTIVIST AND ADVOCATE FOR THE POOR AND THE MARGINALIZED
THE FEAST OF KARL OTTO EBERHARDT, GERMAN MORAVIAN ORGANIST, MUSIC, EDUCATOR, AND COMPOSER
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Above: The Death of Ahab, by Gustave Dore
Image in the Public Domain
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Collect:
O God, our true life, to serve you is freedom, and to know you is unending joy.
We worship you, we glorify you, we give thanks to you for your great glory.
Abide with us, reign in us, and make this world into a fit habitation for your divine majesty,
through Jesus Christ, our Savior and Lord, who reigns with you
and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and forever. Amen.
—Evangelical Lutheran Worship (2006), page 53
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Assigned Readings:
2 Chronicles 18:12-22
Psalm 46
Hebrews 9:23-28
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
God is our refuge and strength,
a very present help in trouble.
–Psalm 46:1, The Book of Common Prayer (1979)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The account from 2 Chronicles 18, quite similar to one in 1 Kings 22, agrees with that sentiment and emphasizes the impropriety of a military alliance with an evil ally–in this case, King Ahab of Israel (reigned 873-852 B.C.E.). King Jehoshaphat of Judah (reigned 870-846 B.C.E.) enters into a military alliance with Ahab against Aram, a shared enemy. Only Micaiah, one prophet in a particular group of prophets, says that the planned attack at Ramoth-gilead is a bad idea. He resists pressure to claim otherwise. Micaiah is, of course, correct. Ahab dies. Jehoshaphat survives, to hear from one Jehu son of Hanani of God’s displeasure over the alliance:
For this, wrath is upon you from the LORD. However, there is good in you, for you have purged the land of the sacred posts and have dedicated yourself to worship God.
–2 Chronicles 19:2b-3, TANAKH: The Holy Scriptures (1985)
One can read of the reign of Jehoshaphat in 1 Kings 22:1-51 and 2 Chronicles 17:1-20:37.
Hebrews 9:23-28 concerns itself with the atoning qualities of the crucifixion of Jesus. I, as a student of Christian history, in particular of the development of doctrine and theology, know of three early theories of the Atonement. Two of these include the death of Christ. Penal Substitutionary Atonement does not satisfy me (forgive the double entendre), for it depicts a deity in which to stand in dread, not awe.
I will not be satisfied until people torture and kill my son,
that deity proclaims. The Classic Theory, or Christus Victor, however, places correct emphasis on the resurrection. Without the resurrection we have dead Jesus, who cannot save anyone.
Both Ahab and Jesus died. Ahab, who died foolishly (despite warning) and was idolatrous and evil (consult 1 Kings 16:29-22:40 and 2 Chronicles 18:1-34) had it coming. Jesus, however, was innocent of any offense before God. The death of Ahab brought to the throne of Israel his son, Ahaziah, who followed in his father’s ignominious footsteps (consult 1 Kings 22:52-54; 2 Kings 1:1-18). The death of Jesus, in contrast, played a role in the salvation of the human race from sin.
May we who follow Jesus respond to him, treating him as our savior, not merely another martyr to admire. Grace is free yet not cheap; ask Jesus. It demands much of us, such as that we not be as Kings Ahab and Ahaziah were.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
JUNE 7, 2016 COMMON ERA
THE FEAST OF FREDERICK LUCIAN HOSMER, U.S. UNITARIAN HYMN WRITER
THE FEAST OF SAINT ANTHONY MARY GIANELLI, FOUNDER OF THE MISSIONARIES OF SAINT ALPHONSUS LIGUORI AND THE SISTERS OF MARY DELL’ORTO
THE FEAST OF CHARLES AUGUSTUS BRIGGS, U.S. PRESBYTERIAN PASTOR THEN EPISCOPAL PRIEST
THE FEAST OF SAINT ROBERT OF NEWMINSTER, ROMAN CATHOLIC ABBOT AND PRIEST
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adapted from this post:
https://ordinarytimedevotions.wordpress.com/2016/06/07/devotion-for-thursday-before-proper-29-year-c-elca-daily-lectionary/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You must be logged in to post a comment.